Conversation
When one-to-many relationship is optional in the one side, `prisma-markdown` could not express it in the diagram. Also, if one side is optional, but many side is mandatory, `prisma-markdown` also could not express it exactly, either. This PR fixes the bug, so that one side optional cardinality can be exactly represented.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
erDiagram "one" |o--|{ "many" : specialWhen one-to-many relationship is optional in the one side,
prisma-markdowncould not express it in the diagram. Also, if one side is optional, but many side is mandatory,prisma-markdownalso could not express it exactly, either.This PR fixes the bug, so that one side optional cardinality can be exactly represented.