Skip to content

Implement RFC #1245 : unsafe const fn#28827

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
thepowersgang:unsafe-const-fn-2
Oct 14, 2015
Merged

Implement RFC #1245 : unsafe const fn#28827
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
thepowersgang:unsafe-const-fn-2

Conversation

@thepowersgang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is the original test implementation, which works according to the tests I wrote, but might need a review.

@rust-highfive

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

r? @pnkfelix

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@thepowersgang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Feel free to hold off on this until the amendment is merged.

@thepowersgang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Just for reference (and linking the issues), this is an implementation of rust-lang/rfcs#1245

@Aatch

Aatch commented Oct 13, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors r+ 4c88bf2

@bors

bors commented Oct 13, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 4c88bf2 with merge 8d2e3f5...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2015
This is the original test implementation, which works according to the tests I wrote, but might need a review.
@alexcrichton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors: retry force

@bors

bors commented Oct 14, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 4c88bf2 with merge 9ea0065...

@bors

bors commented Oct 14, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⛄ The build was interrupted to prioritize another pull request.

@bors

bors commented Oct 14, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 4c88bf2 with merge a668dd2...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2015
This is the original test implementation, which works according to the tests I wrote, but might need a review.
@bors bors merged commit 4c88bf2 into rust-lang:master Oct 14, 2015
@phil-opp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What about the order? In rust-lang/rfcs#1245 the order was set to const unsafe fn (see aturon's comment). But this PR seems to implement unsafe const fn.

@thepowersgang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Huh... implements the RFC as merged, but yes, @aturon's comment did state the other ordering.

@brson

brson commented Oct 16, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants