ci: move dist-x86_64-msvc to windows 2025

[marcoieni]

This job is very flaky: it failed 19 times in the last month.

See also this zulip thread and this GitHub issue.

Windows 2025 is working well for x86_64-msvc jobs since we moved them in #135632 so we want to move this runner as well to try to reduce the flakiness.

try-job: dist-x86_64-msvc

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[marcoieni]

@bors try

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit d4dce76 with merge 50541ea...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 50541ea (50541ea39767240c47cffcc02ed07ff7638f35dc)

[Kobzol]

You can r=me (in case you want to do more try builds).

[marcoieni]

I noticed some differences:

In the image, the try build is on the left, while on the right there's the latest auto build.

As you can see, the try build doesn't have Run tests and has less CI artifacts. Is it normal?

[Kobzol]

Yes, try builds don't run opt-dist tests by default and build less components overall, it's fine. This is tied to DIST_TRY_BUILD.

[marcoieni]

@bors r=Kobzol

[bors]

📌 Commit d4dce76 has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[tgross35]

@bors p=10 rollup=never

Before this job fails anything else

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit d4dce76 with merge affdb59...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Kobzol
Pushing affdb59 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (affdb59): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	4.9%	[4.9%, 4.9%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.6%	[-3.6%, -3.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.6%	[-3.6%, 4.9%]	2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 778.951s -> 779.81s (0.11%)
Artifact size: 328.87 MiB -> 328.85 MiB (-0.01%)