Properly check for builtin derived code#108128
Conversation
|
r? @jackh726 (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams! If this PR contains changes to any Examples of
|
|
Should this be a rustc_* attr rather than have its own feature gate? |
|
I didn't make it |
cbf518c to
d42627f
Compare
builtin_derived attr|
Updated to check for an @rustbot label -T-libs |
d42627f to
59512d9
Compare
59512d9 to
90f642b
Compare
|
@bors r+ |
|
⌛ Testing commit 90f642b with merge a56d216122f14e2cc26dffbf3304e85b2dcaee2d... |
|
💥 Test timed out |
|
@bors retry timeout |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (21e5b94): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. |
Fixes #108122