Skip to content

[GHSA-p436-gjf2-799p] Docker CLI Plugins: Uncontrolled Search Path Element Leads to Local Privilege Escalation on Windows#7269

Merged
advisory-database[bot] merged 1 commit intolevpachmanov/advisory-improvement-7269from
levpachmanov-GHSA-p436-gjf2-799p
Mar 31, 2026
Merged

[GHSA-p436-gjf2-799p] Docker CLI Plugins: Uncontrolled Search Path Element Leads to Local Privilege Escalation on Windows#7269
advisory-database[bot] merged 1 commit intolevpachmanov/advisory-improvement-7269from
levpachmanov-GHSA-p436-gjf2-799p

Conversation

@levpachmanov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Updates

  • Affected products

Comments
See the discussion here - #7207

@github
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

github commented Mar 31, 2026

Hi there @thaJeztah! A community member has suggested an improvement to your security advisory. If approved, this change will affect the global advisory listed at github.com/advisories. It will not affect the version listed in your project repository.

This change will be reviewed by our Security Curation Team. If you have thoughts or feedback, please share them in a comment here! If this PR has already been closed, you can start a new community contribution for this advisory

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the base branch from main to levpachmanov/advisory-improvement-7269 March 31, 2026 10:16
@thaJeztah
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Curious, because we tend to run into this situation where "module version" and "binary version" get conflated, and often scanners don't have the granularity to deep-inspect if a code-path is used; what's the correct "ecosystem" to pick to differentiate binaries (or deb / rpm) from "go module (library)"? I think we tried Other in some cases, but there was still some ambiguity.

Screenshot 2026-03-31 at 12 22 00

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@thaJeztah thaJeztah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

cc @vvoland

@advisory-database advisory-database bot merged commit 0fe3210 into levpachmanov/advisory-improvement-7269 Mar 31, 2026
4 checks passed
@advisory-database
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @levpachmanov! Thank you so much for contributing to the GitHub Advisory Database. This database is free, open, and accessible to all, and it's people like you who make it great. Thanks for choosing to help others. We hope you send in more contributions in the future!

@advisory-database advisory-database bot deleted the levpachmanov-GHSA-p436-gjf2-799p branch March 31, 2026 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants