Skip to content

[glyphsetProof] reliance on f.glyphOrder may lead to missing glyphs #12

@frankrolf

Description

@frankrolf

f.glyphOrder is not required to contain all glyphs in the UFO, so we may end up missing some in the proof (to-do)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions